Professor of English Jeffrey Kahan talked about the life and mysteries of William Henry Ireland during his lecture titled “Forging a Ghost: The Hunt for Bruno,” Monday in the President’s Dining Room.
Kahan began with a description of Ireland’s early life and upbringing in London in the late 1700s, where Ireland was known for apparently forging Shakespearean documents and plays.
“How would we feel if the scholarly writings we quote regularly were all fake?” Kahan said. “Are academic fakes worse than literary fakes?”
“Bruno” was the title of one of the supposed forged books that Ireland had claimed to write, but was never found.
The topic of forgery was central to Kahan’s discussion of Ireland who led a life of forgery.
He referenced Anthony Grafton, a professor at Princeton University and one of the foremost historians of early modern Europe, about the effects of forgery in an academic setting.
Grafton believes that it is critical that academics not tolerate forgery.
Kahan presented findings proving that Ireland forged significant documents and plays supposedly written by Shakespeare himself.
He said everyone knew Ireland was the forger because he had confessed to it, even though they had never found some works, including “Bruno.”
“(Ireland) had hoped that he would be considered a genius and (a) guy who fooled the world,” Kahan said.
He said perhaps Ireland did not do it for financial benefits, but maybe to find a literary identity of his own.
“Forgery is all about identity,” Kahan said.
“Aren’t we all forgers? Isn’t this identity in the room you’re sitting in different from the identity of yourself playing in the backyard with your dog?”
Kahan said he believed that Ireland figured if he had no identity, why not just play cat and mouse with the idea and adopt the persona of the man who forged the Shakespearian letters.
Kahan said there are many reasons why Ireland supposedly forged the letters.
“It’s kind of like ‘Law & Order’ – you can go through it again and again,” Kahan said.
“I was very fascinated as to what Ireland’s intentions were when he claimed to be the forger,” said freshman business major Cody Luk, who attended the Monday talk.
“You couldn’t help but pay close attention and try figuring out the conclusion to Ireland’s story,” said Alexis Wood, junior anthropology major.
“It’s interesting that the topic of forgery was just as important then as it is now except now it’s way easier to do what he did back then this day in age,” junior business administration major Rebecca Ayala said.
Candice Nuñez can be reached at email@example.com.